4.6 Article

Full-range nonlinear analysis of post-tensioned anchorage zones based on modified strut-and-tie model

期刊

STRUCTURES
卷 35, 期 -, 页码 565-576

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2021.10.073

关键词

Post-tensioned anchorage zones; Serviceability behavior; Modified strut-and-tie model; Maximum crack width

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51808208, 51878151]
  2. fundamental research funds for the central universities [2242021R20011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper introduces a modified strut-and-tie model (MSTM) to predict the behavior of concentric anchorage zones throughout loading process. By incorporating compatibility conditions and simplified formulas, the elastic and inelastic behavior of concentric anchorage zones, including load-strain response, load-deformation response, and crack width, can be estimated.
The strut-and-tie model (STM) has been adopted as a preferred methodology for the design of the post tensioned concentric anchorage zones. However, the STM is just a design model at ultimate limit state developed based on the elastic stress trajectory without the consideration of stress redistribution after cracking, which can not be used to predict the serviceability behavior of anchorage zones. To address this issue, this paper is devoted to developing a modified strut-and-tie model (MSTM) to predict the behavior of concentric anchorage zones throughout loading process. The compatibility condition was introduced into MSTM based on the principle of stationary complementary energy at each load step. According to MSTM, the elastic and inelastic behavior of concentric anchorage zones, including load-strain response, load-deformation response and crack width, can be estimated from loading to failure. Moreover, simplified formulas have been proposed to calculate the first cracking load, ultimate load and the maximum crack width. Finally, the proposed MSTM was validated by the testing results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据