4.7 Article

Anomaly Detection in Maritime AIS Tracks: A Review of Recent Approaches

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jmse10010112

关键词

automatic identification system; AIS; anomaly detection; maritime safety; maritime security; maritime surveillance

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry of Economic Affairs and Climate Action (BMWK) within the Maritime Research Programme [03SX543B]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The automatic identification system (AIS) plays a crucial role in enhancing maritime safety by transmitting important information about vessels and enabling collision avoidance. It has been widely used in various applications and has the potential to greatly support vessel traffic services and collision risk assessment. Anomalies in AIS tracks can indicate safety and security-related events. With the increasing availability of AIS data, there is a growing need for automatic detection of anomalous AIS data.
The automatic identification system (AIS) was introduced in the maritime domain to increase the safety of sea traffic. AIS messages are transmitted as broadcasts to nearby ships and contain, among others, information about the identification, position, speed, and course of the sending vessels. AIS can thus serve as a tool to avoid collisions and increase onboard situational awareness. In recent years, AIS has been utilized in more and more applications since it enables worldwide surveillance of virtually any larger vessel and has the potential to greatly support vessel traffic services and collision risk assessment. Anomalies in AIS tracks can indicate events that are relevant in terms of safety and also security. With a plethora of accessible AIS data nowadays, there is a growing need for the automatic detection of anomalous AIS data. In this paper, we survey 44 research articles on anomaly detection of maritime AIS tracks. We identify the tackled AIS anomaly types, assess their potential use cases, and closely examine the landscape of recent AIS anomaly research as well as their limitations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据