4.7 Article

Adaptive Auto-Berthing Control of Underactuated Vessel Based on Barrier Lyapunov Function

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jmse10020279

关键词

barrier Lyapunov function; basis function network; minimum learning parameter; dynamic surface control; automatic berthing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the automatic berthing problem of underactuated surface vessels in the case of uncertain dynamics and yaw rate limitation. It proposes the use of differential homeomorphism coordinate transformation, radial basis function network, and barrier Lyapunov function to solve the underactuation problem. It also applies dynamic surface control technology and minimum learning parameters to tackle differential explosion problems and computational complexity. Simulation results show that the proposed method effectively limits the yaw rate and solves the influence of model uncertainty.
This paper investigates the automatic berthing problem of underactuated surface vessels in the case of uncertain dynamics and yaw rate limitation, given the importance of yaw rate control and the unmeasurable hydrodynamic parameters of the vessel at low speeds. First, we use the differential homeomorphism coordinate transformation to solve the problem of underactuation. Second, a radial basis function network (RBF) is introduced to approximate unknown nonlinear functions. Third, we apply the barrier Lyapunov function (BLF) approach to limit the yaw rate within a safe range. Fourth, we use dynamic surface control (DSC) technology and minimum learning parameters (MLP) to tackle the differential explosion problems in backstepping and computational complexity. Finally, Lyapunov stability theory proves that signals produced by the designed control scheme are bounded and effective. The simulation results show that, compared with the control scheme without BLF, the proposed method can effectively limit the yaw rate within a specific range and effectively solves the influence of the model uncertainly.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据