4.6 Article

Assessment of polyethersulfone and polyacrylonitrile hemodialysis clinical membranes: In situ synchrotron-based imaging of human serum proteins adsorption, interaction analyses, molecular docking and clinical inflammatory biomarkers investigations

期刊

MATERIALS TODAY COMMUNICATIONS
卷 29, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102928

关键词

Hemodialysis membranes; Human serum proteins interactions; Molecular docking; In situ Synchrotron radiation micro-computed tomography; Inflammatory biomarkers

资金

  1. New Frontiers in Research Fund
  2. SSHRC
  3. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
  4. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC)
  5. biomedical imaging and therapy beamline (BMIT) at the Canadian Light Source (CLS)
  6. national research facility of the University of Saskatchewan
  7. Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI)
  8. Government of Saskatchewan
  9. University of Saskatchewan
  10. National Research Council (NRC)
  11. Health Sciences Laboratories, Saskatchewan Structure Science Centre (SSSC)
  12. High Performance Computing Research Facility (HPCRF)
  13. the imaging center at the University of Saskatchewan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study delves into the effects of blood-membrane interactions of commonly used PES and PAN membranes in Canadian hospitals on their biocompatibility, analyzing blood activation and proinflammatory cytokine production both experimentally and theoretically. Different tendencies of protein membrane-surface adhesion for PES and PAN contribute to variations in biological activations, highlighting the importance of surface hydrophilicity in protein/membrane biocompatibility.
While hemodialysis augments the physiological functions of the kidney in end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, inherent membrane properties initiate life-threating biological episodes upon contact with blood. Membrane materials have different morphological and chemical properties that may become complement, leukocyte and even coagulation activators leading to several cardiovascular diseases due to biocompatibility issues upon contact with blood. The present study offers an in-depth understanding into two commonly used clinical polyethersulfone (PES) and polyacrylonitrile (PAN) membranes in Canadian hospitals and the effects of blood-membrane interactions on their biocompatibility, in terms of the initiation of blood activation and proinflammatory cytokine, from both experimental and theoretical standpoints. PES and PAN were thoroughly investigated to explore their susceptibility toward interaction with three human serum proteins. The extent of protein adsorption, and subsequent interactions on the membrane surfaces were investigated after ultrafiltration with human serum albumin (ALB), fibrinogen (FB) and transferrin (TR) proteins. The buildup of protein microparticles across different stratified membrane layers was probed using Synchrotron-based X-ray microtomography conducted with a biomedical imaging and therapy (BMIT 05ID-2) beamline at the Canada's national synchrotron light source facility. Furthermore, evidence of protein adhesion has been exhaustively investigated by surface chemical analyses and high-resolution surface imaging. The difference tendencies toward protein membrane-surface adhesion for both materials contributed to biological activations when studying in vitro clinical tests with inflammatory biomarkers using Human Magnetic Luminex assays of Serpin/Antithrombin-III, Properdin, C5a, 1L-1 alpha, 1L-1 beta, TNF-alpha IL6, and vWF. Experimental results have been complemented with Molecular Modeling Docking analyses in the assessment of interaction patterns of human serum proteins in a view to understanding the relationship between functional group chemistry and membrane-surface bonding. Our models reveal inherent binding between PAN nitrogen atoms and protein-bound amino acids while the PES model proposes a contribution with its sulfone chemical groups as a prerequisite to membrane-surface binding resulting in high levels of complement and inflammation factors. The differences in protein adhesion between both clinical membrane modules are attributed to varying degrees of surface hydrophilicity as a direct factor of protein/membrane biocompatibility. Both membranes interacted differently with ALB, FB and TR, however, PAN membrane exhibited less affinity for protein adsorption and membrane-surface fouling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据