4.6 Article

Hot deformation behavior and microstructure evolution of a high Nb containing PM TiAl composite reinforced with Ti2AlC particles

期刊

MATERIALS TODAY COMMUNICATIONS
卷 29, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102862

关键词

TiAl alloy; Hot deformation; Constitutive equation; Microstructure

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51704088]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province of China [YQ2020E030]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the hot deformation behavior and microstructure evolution of a PM TiAl alloy reinforced with Ti2AlC particles. Results showed that Ti2AlC particles effectively hindered dislocation pile-up, strengthened the alloy, and induced recrystallization nucleation. Additionally, the Ti2AlC particles significantly restricted grain growth, with dynamic recrystallization dominating the softening mechanism.
The hot deformation behavior and microstructure evolution of a PM TiAl alloy with a nominal composition of Ti45Al-10Nb (at%.) reinforced with Ti2AlC particles were investigated by isothermal compression tests at temperatures ranging from 950 degrees C to 1100 degrees C, and at strain rates from 0.1 s(-1) to 0.001 s(-1). The true stress-strain curves exhibited a typical single peak characteristic. A hyperbolic-sine-type Arrhenius equation can describe the dependence of the peak stress on the deformation temperature and strain rate well. The calculated values of apparent activation energy and stress exponent were 389 +/- 25 kJ/mol and 4.4, respectively. The Ti2AlC inclusions served as an effective obstacle leading to the dislocation pile-up, which strengthened the alloy and induced recrystallization nucleation. Moreover, the grain growth was significantly restricted due to an obstructive effect on grain boundary migration by Ti2AlC particles. Based on microstructure analysis, the softening mechanism was dominated by dynamic recrystallization (DRX) with the assistance of dynamic recovery (DRV).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据