4.6 Review

A Review on Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy in Different Cancers Diagnosis and Classification

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PHYSICS
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fphy.2022.821057

关键词

laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy; cancer; detection; tissue; chemometrics

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [62075011]
  2. Graduate Technological Innovation Project of Beijing Institute of Technology [2019CX20026]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Due to its wide applicability, Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) is gaining momentum as a medical diagnostic tool in various cancer diseases. Quantitative analysis using chemometric and signal enhancement techniques, as well as the development of robust and effective LIBS devices, are crucial for its successful implementation in the medical field.
Due to the new demonstrations of Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) applicability in a surprisingly wide variety of applications, the use of LIBS as a medical diagnostic tool is steadily gaining momentum. Especially in different cancer diseases, LIBS has the potential to become a fast and valuable analytical tool. We addressed LIBS equipment and quantitative analytical procedures, and signal enhancement techniques for improving element detection. For detailed aspects of applications, we reviewed the recent progress of LIBS in different cancer diseases diagnoses by using different tissues and medical fluid as samples. To fulfill the high demands in the medical industry and overcome the severe tissue sample problem, it is proposed that the chemometric and signal amplification techniques for quantitative analysis should be employed, and robust and effective LIBS devices should be developed. This overview of the different cancers by LIBS is meant to summarize the research performed to date and suggest some suitable advanced chemometrics techniques and effective LIBS devices, if successfully implemented, would be significantly beneficial to the medical field in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据