4.7 Article

Middle-Aged and Older African Americans' Information Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Interview Study

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.709416

关键词

COVID-19; African Americans; information use; interview; health disparities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Middle-aged and older African American individuals primarily rely on routine media consumption to access information about COVID-19, with few actively searching for information outside of regular media use. When evaluating information quality, strategies including checking source credibility, comparing multiple sources, fact-checking, and praying are utilized. These findings could inform future health communication efforts aimed at disseminating information about the COVID-19 pandemic and future infectious disease outbreaks within African American communities.
African Americans in the United States have been disproportionately affected by the COVID-19 pandemic in infection and mortality rates. This study examined how middle-aged and older African American individuals accessed and evaluated the information about COVID-19. Semi-structured interviews with 20 individuals (age: 41-72) were conducted during the first stay-at-home advisory period in late March and early April 2020. The phronetic iterative approach was used for data analysis. We found that these individuals primarily relied on information scanning based on their routine media consumption to acquire information about COVID-19 and seldom actively searched for information outside of their regular media use. Individuals used several strategies to assess the quality of the information they received, including checking source credibility, comparing multiple sources, fact-checking, and praying. These findings could inform media and governmental agencies' future health communication efforts to disseminate information about the COVID-19 pandemic and future infectious disease outbreaks among the African American communities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据