4.7 Article

Bubble explosion in pool boiling around a heated wire in surfactant solution

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.03.111

关键词

Subcooled pool boiling; Heat transfer enhancement; Surfactant; Jet flow; Bubble explosion

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51276046, 51506037]
  2. Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [51421063]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper reports a new pool boiling phenomenon of bubble explosion in a surfactant solution. The working fluid was an aqueous solution of cetyltrimethyl ammonium chloride (CTAC) with addition of sodium salicylate (NaSal) at the same mass concentration. A platinum wire was horizontally placed in the fluid for heating. The boiling heat transfer performances of the tested fluid at fluid temperature (288.15 K) and different concentrations of CTAC/NaSal solution (0-400 ppm) have been presented. It's found that the tested surfactant solution significantly augmented boiling heat transfer as compared with water, and the best heat transfer performance was found at the concentration ranging from 5 to 100 ppm. With a high-speed camera and an inverted microscope, the nucleation boiling process on the heated wire was recorded. For the first time, we observed a new bubble explosion phenomenon around the heated wire in CTAC/NaSal solutions (at concentration beyond 0.1 ppm), which is apparently different from the previously reported boiling explosion due to homogeneous nucleation. Together with the observed strong jet-flow behaviors, bubble explosion strengthened the local disturbance and enhanced the boiling heat transfer. It was conjectured that the strong jet-flow phenomenon is essentially the traces of small bubbles and bubble explosion is a failed coalescence of unstable bubbles, which leads to the disturbance and boiling heat transfer enhancement. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据