4.5 Article

Morphogenetic Polyvariance in the Colonial Hydroid Dynamena pumila (L.)

期刊

DIVERSITY-BASEL
卷 13, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/d13120683

关键词

phenotypic plasticity; morphological abnormalities; ecology; evolution

资金

  1. Russian Foundation [07-04-00736-a, 01-04-48798]
  2. Lomonosov Moscow State University [121032300118-0]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found aberrant modules in the colonial hydroid Dynamena pumila, with deviations in structure but other modules formed normally. All morphovariations are classified into four groups based on possible reasons for occurrence. The position and occurrence of aberrant modules are not solely caused by environmental factors, indicating a special phenomenon called morphogenetic polyvariance.
The formation of aberrant modules (internodes) of the shoot was found sporadically in the colonial hydroid Dynamena pumila from the family Sertulariidae, which is distinguished by the symmetrical two-row position of the hydrotheca on the shoot stem. Despite rare significant deviations from the norm in the structure of some modules, the following modules in the shoots are formed normally. All variants of deviation from the norm (called morphovariations) are classified and, in general, are represented by four groups according to the possible reasons for their occurrence. The morphotypes are the most interesting morphological variations and look like similar modules in other genera of hydroids. Considering the position of the aberrant modules on the shoots of one colony, we can confidently infer that they were formed at different times, which undermines the assumption that deviations from the norm in morphogenesis were caused by environmental factors. All morphovariations are characterized by certain occurrences. Consequently, the described phenomenon is not limited to phenotypic plasticity, polymorphism, or sequential changes of phenotypes in the life cycle and, therefore, is singled out as a special phenomenon called morphogenetic polyvariance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据