4.7 Article

Improved multi-objective Hybrid Genetic Algorithm for Shape and Size Optimization of Free-form latticed structures

期刊

JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING
卷 43, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102902

关键词

Free-form latticed structures; Shape optimization; Size optimization; Hybrid genetic algorithm; Fully stressed design

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51478335]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An improved multi-objective hybrid genetic algorithm is proposed for the shape and size optimization of large-scale free-form spatial latticed structures. The method uses B-spline theory and incorporates fully stressed design to obtain an optimal set of cross-sections of the members.
Industrial and public buildings generally adopt spatial latticed structures as roofs, where the number of members is too large for the traditional genetic algorithm (GA) to conduct size optimization. In this paper, an improved multi-objective hybrid genetic algorithm incorporating the fully stressed design (FSD), called NSGA-II-FSD, is proposed for the shape and size optimization of large-scale free-form spatial latticed structures. The proposed method uses the B-spline theory, which makes it easier to generate free-form surfaces that meet the aesthetic requirements. The total mass and strain energy of the structure are selected as the objective functions, and the strength, as well as the stability of the member, are taken as the constraints. By incorporating the FSD, one can also set the stress ratio limit and get an optimal set of cross-sections of the members under the desired margin of safety. Besides, a significant mutation strategy is proposed in order to expand the searching boundary, which can avoid premature convergence. Through numerical examples of a cylindrical latticed shell and a free-form space truss, it is proved that the proposed method is effective, and engineers can choose the solution according to their preferences in practical design.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据