4.7 Article

Mechanical and durability properties of ultra-high performance concrete incorporated with various nano waste materials under different curing conditions

期刊

JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING
卷 43, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102569

关键词

Ultrahigh-performance concrete; Nano waste materials; Mechanical properties; Ultrasonic pulse velocity; Sulphate attack; Curing regimes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research compared the performance of UHPC with different curing regimes and various nanomaterials. The results showed that SC and IC had similar effects on most nanomaterials, while PEG had a negative impact on NRHA. Compressive strength increased under IC for NWG, NRHA, NMK and NS, while sorptivity decreased for NS, NMK, NWG and NRHA.
This research presents a comparative study of different curing regimes, namely, standard curing (SC), internal curing (IC) with polyethylene glycol (PEG) and air curing (AC), used in ultrahigh-performance concrete (UHPC) premixed with different types of nanomaterials. Four types of nano waste materials were prepared, i.e. milled nano-metakaolin (NMK), nano waste glass (NWG) and nano rice husk ash (NRHA) and chemically prepared nano silica (NS). Several UHPC mixes with nanomaterial dosages (1%, 2% and 3%) were investigated. Compressive strength, ultrasonic pulse velocity, sulphate attack and microstructure were analysed. Results indicated the similarity between the performance of SC and IC in NS, NWG and NMK. Moreover, the addition of PEG exerted a negative effect on NRHA. Compressive strength increased by 17%, 24%, 14% and 13% under IC in NWG, NRH, NMK and NS, respectively. By contrast, sorptivity decreased by 84%, 60%, 48% and 60% in NS, NMK, NWG and NRHA under IC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据