4.7 Article

Impact resistance of concrete produced with plain and reinforced cold-bonded fly ash aggregates

期刊

JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING
卷 42, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102875

关键词

Cold bonding; Fiber reinforced fly ash aggregates; Electron microscopy; Fly ash aggregate concrete; Impact resistance; Statistical analysis

资金

  1. Bogazici University Research Fund [15A04D2]
  2. Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the impact resistance of concrete produced with different types of fly ash aggregates replacing crushed stone coarse aggregates. The addition of polypropylene fibers and crumb rubber into the fly ash pellets enhanced the impact resistance of concrete.
In this paper, the impact resistance of concrete produced with cold-bonded fly ash aggregates (FAAs) in partial or full replacement, by volume, of crushed limestone coarse aggregates was investigated. Fly ash aggregates were produced as plain (PFAA), with 0.1% crumb rubber (CRRFAA) and with 0.1% polypropylene fibers (PPFRFAA), by weight, as reinforcement. Nine concretes are produced at w/c of 0.40 by replacing crushed stone coarse aggregate at 4-8 mm, 8-16 mm and 4-16 mm size fractions with fly ash aggregate together with the control concrete having a target compressive strength of 50 MPa. While use of different types of FAAs resulted in slight to substantial decrease of compressive and splitting tensile strengths and impact resistance of concretes, higher values are obtained in concretes with FAAs replacing 8-16 mm size group of crushed stone coarse aggregate. Polypropylene fiber and crumb rubber addition into the fly ash pellets increased the ability of the aggregates to absorb energy and thus the impact resistance of concrete. The polypropylene fibers protruding from the surface of FAAs might have caused better adherence of the FAAs to the cement paste to result in higher impact resistance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据