4.6 Review

Small-Bowel Capsule Endoscopy-Optimizing Capsule Endoscopy in Clinical Practice

期刊

DIAGNOSTICS
卷 11, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11112139

关键词

small bowel; capsule; endoscopy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) has revolutionized the diagnosis of small bowel pathology by offering a non-invasive and well-tolerated procedure. However, there are still uncertainties in technical aspects, such as incomplete examinations, poor imaging quality, and the risk of capsule retention, which hinders its clinical utility.
The small bowel is the longest organ within the gastrointestinal tract. The emergence of small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) over the last 20 years has revolutionized the investigation and diagnosis of small bowel pathology. Its utility as a non-invasive and well-tolerated procedure, which can be performed in an outpatient setting, has made it a valuable diagnostic tool. The indications for SBCE include obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, small bowel Crohn's disease, and, less frequently for screening in polyposis syndromes, celiac disease, or other small bowel pathology. Currently, there are several small bowel capsules on the market from different manufacturers; however, they share many technological features. The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) only recently developed a set of key quality indicators to guide quality standards in this area. Many of the technical aspects of capsule endoscopy still feature a degree of uncertainty in terms of optimal performance. Incomplete studies due to slow transit through the bowel, poor imaging secondary to poor preparation, and the risk of capsule retention remain frustrations in its clinical utility. Capsule review is a time-consuming process; however, artificial intelligence and machine learning offer opportunities to improve this. This narrative review examines our current standing in a number of these aspects and the potential to further the application of SBCE in order to maximize its diagnostic utility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据