4.6 Article

Preparation and Adsorption Properties of Soybean Dreg/Hydrocalumite Composites

期刊

ACS OMEGA
卷 6, 期 41, 页码 27491-27500

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.1c04460

关键词

-

资金

  1. Scientific Research Fund of Hunan Provincial Education Department of China [19A444]
  2. Scientific Innovation Project of Graduate Students in Shaoyang University of China [CX2019SY012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study prepared soybean dreg/hydro-calumite composites for the adsorption of Congo Red, showing better adsorption performance compared to individual soybean dregs or hydrocalumite. The optimized 30%BD-LDH composite achieved a removal rate of 97.4% with an adsorption capacity of 486.8 mg.g(-1), which was significantly higher than that of hydrocalumite and soybean dregs. Additionally, the adsorption process of CR by 30%BD-LDH followed pseudo-second-order kinetic and Langmuir isothermal models.
The application of biomass-based composites in the field of adsorption has attracted extensive attention. Herein, soybean dreg/hydro-calumite composites were prepared by in situ self-assembly from soybean dregs and applied to the adsorption of Congo Red (CR). The composites were characterized by scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, Fourier infrared spectroscopy, and N-2 physical adsorption-desorption. The results showed that the adsorption property of soybean dregs/hydrocalumite for CR was better than that of soybean dregs or hydrocalumite. Effects of preparation and adsorption conditions on the adsorption of CR by soybean dregs/hydrocalumite were also investigated. The removal rate of soybean dregs/hydrocalumite (30%BD-LDH) prepared under the optimized conditions reached 97.4% with a 486.8 mg.g(-1) adsorption capacity. Also, the adsorption capacity of 30%BD-LDH was about 2.4 times and 3.0 times that of hydrocalumite and soybean dregs, respectively. In addition, the adsorption process of CR by 30%BD-LDH was more in line with the pseudo-second-order kinetic and Langmuir isothermal models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据