4.6 Article

Consecutive Organosolv and Alkaline Pretreatment: An Efficient Approach toward the Production of Cellulose from Rice Straw

期刊

ACS OMEGA
卷 6, 期 41, 页码 27247-27258

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.1c04030

关键词

-

资金

  1. Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), Government of India [ECR/2016/001331]
  2. CIAB
  3. SERB
  4. CSIR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents two different two-step approaches for the efficient removal of silica from rice straw and separation of its major components, resulting in the obtainment of highly pure cellulose.
The efficient removal of silica from rice straw and separation of its major components is essential for further valorization to produce value-added products. With regard to this, the isolation of cellulose (CEL), hemicellulose (HEM), and lignin (LIG) is imperative but quite challenging. Among several pretreatments of lignocellulosic biomass, the organosolv approach is deemed as one of the promising methods. Here, we present two different two-step approaches for the removal of silica and disintegration of significant components from rice straw, especially CEL; (i) base pretreatment, followed by organosolv treatment in the presence of organic acid, and (ii) organosolv pretreatment in the presence of organic acid, followed by base treatment. After each treatment, the recovered solid components are confirmed by various characterization techniques such as Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, field emission scanning electron microscopy, and thermogravimetric analysis. Method 2 demonstrates 82% total removal of HEM and LIG along with 90.4% of silica removal from rice straw to obtain CEL. Furthermore, the obtained crude CEL is found to be with a purity of 78%. Excellent removal of silica (90.4%) reflects that in a test study, the crude CEL obtained from method 2 gives a higher yield of butyl glucosides (59.6%) than rice straw, which affords 45.0% of butyl glucosides.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据