4.6 Review

Simultaneous Electrical and Mechanical Characterization of Single-Molecule Junctions Using AFM-BJ Technique

期刊

ACS OMEGA
卷 6, 期 46, 页码 30873-30888

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.1c04785

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [21722305, 21673195, 21703188]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M622060]
  3. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFA0204902]
  4. Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences [BNLMS202005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Simultaneous characterization of the mechanical and electrical properties of single-molecule junctions provides complementary information for analyzing single molecules and studying the correlations between their electrical and mechanical properties. Exploring the mechanical properties of single-molecule junctions is helpful for addressing the issue of inadequate structural information extraction from single-molecule junctions.
The fabrication and characterization of single-molecule junctions provide a unique platform to study the physical phenomena of a single molecule, and the electrical characterization enables us to understand the electrical transport properties of a single molecule and guide the fabrication of molecular electronic devices. However, the electrical characterization of single-molecule junctions is sometimes insufficient to extract the structural information on single-molecule junctions, and an alternate method to address this problem is to characterize the mechanical properties of single-molecule junctions. Simultaneous measurement of mechanical and electrical properties can provide complementary information on single molecules to analyze the correlations of their electrical and mechanical properties in the evolution of single-molecule junctions. In this mini-review, we summarize the progress on the simultaneous characterizations of mechanical and electrical properties for single-molecule junctions, and discuss the challenges and perspectives of this research area.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据