4.6 Article

Analysis of Physical-Chemical Properties and Space Environment Adaptability of Two-Component RTV Silicone Rubber

期刊

ACS OMEGA
卷 6, 期 43, 页码 28477-28484

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.1c00762

关键词

-

资金

  1. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [20ZR1437300, 2020PJD034]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1937601]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explored the use of silicone rubber coatings to protect spacecraft surfaces from atomic oxygen erosion, revealing increased cross-linking density and reduced swelling ratio under high temperature and humidity conditions. Cracks were observed on the coating surface after exposure to atomic oxygen, and the degree of reaction between atomic oxygen and silicone rubber cannot be accurately determined through mass loss measurements.
Silicone rubber (SR) has the properties of organic-inorganic materials and good adaptability to the space environment, which can be used as an atomic oxygen (AO)-resistant layer on the spacecraft surface. In this study, SR coatings were used to spray on the polyimide surface to prevent atomic oxygen erosion. Then, the physical, chemical, and AO-resistant properties of the SR were investigated. By means of laser diffraction scattering particle size distribution tests, energy-dispersive spectroscopy elemental mapping, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, the fillers and matrix were confirmed as precipitated silica and phenyl SR, respectively. Through analysis of swelling behavior, greater cross-linking density and less swelling ratio were observed at higher temperature and humidity. Furthermore, after AO was exposed with an accumulated fluence of 1.2 x 10(21) atoms/cm(2), cracks appeared on the coating surface with the change of element content. In addition, it was found that the degree of reaction between AO and SR should not be determined based on mass loss measurements. Our work showed the practical application and great potential of SR protective coating in spacecraft.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据