4.7 Article

Salt Stress Amelioration in Maize Plants through Phosphogypsum Application and Bacterial Inoculation

期刊

PLANTS-BASEL
卷 10, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/plants10102024

关键词

phosphogypsum; PGPR; soil salinity; nutrient content; maize productivity

资金

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University [R.G.P. 1/112/42]
  2. Soils, Water and Environment Research Institute (SWERI), Agriculture Research Center (ARC), Egypt

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that applying phosphogypsum and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in salt-affected soil can significantly increase maize yield and resistance, contributing to improving soil properties.
The use of phosphogypsum (PG) and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) for agricultural purposes are good options to improve soil properties and increase crop yield. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of different rates of PG (ton ha(-1); 0 (PG1), 3 (PG2), 6 (PG3), and 9 (PG4)) combined with PGPR inoculation (Azospirillum lipoferum (control, T1), A. lipoferum + Bacillus coagulans (T2), A. lipoferum + B. circulance (T3), and A. lipoferum + B. subtilis (T4)) on soil properties, plant physiology, antioxidant enzymes, nutrient uptake, and yield of maize plants (Zea mays L., cv. HSC 10) grown in salt-affected soil. Over two growing seasons, 2019 and 2020, field experiments were conducted as a split-plot design with triplicates. The results show that applying PG (9 ton ha(-1)) and co-inoculation (A. lipoferum + B. circulance) treatment significantly increased chlorophyll and carotenoids content, antioxidant enzymes, microbial communities, soil enzymes activity, and nutrient contents, and showed inhibitory impacts on proline content and pH, as well as EC and ESP, thus improving the productivity of maize plant compared to the control treatment. It could be concluded that PG, along with microbial inoculation, may be an important approach for ameliorating the negative impacts of salinity on maize plants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据