4.7 Article

SNP-Based Analysis Reveals Authenticity and Genetic Similarity of Russian Indigenous V. vinifera Grape Cultivars

期刊

PLANTS-BASEL
卷 10, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/plants10122696

关键词

Vitis vinifera; autochthonous varieties; Russia; genetic identification; genetic diversity; genetic structure; parentage; SNP; phylogenetics; grapevine genetics; cultivars

资金

  1. Kurchatov Center for Genome Research
  2. Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Russian Federation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study sequenced and genotyped 9 Russian Vitis vinifera grape varieties and the European variety Muscat Hamburg using SNPs, revealing that only two of the Russian varieties are related to foreign ones while the remaining seven form separate clusters genetically. This contrasts with historical data and indicates unique genetic relationships among the varieties.
9 Russian Vitis vinifera grape varieties and the European variety Muscat Hamburg were sequenced and genotyped using 527 SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms) with high minor allele frequency for the first time. The data were coupled with previously identified genotypes of 783 varieties and subjected to parentage and population analysis. As a result, contrary to the historical and ampelographic data published in many sources from 1800 to 2012, only two of the nine Russian varieties (Pukhlyakovskiy Belyi and Sibirkovyi) were related to foreign ones and were obviously imported from Europe to the Russian Empire. The remaining seven varieties, led by Krasnostop Zolotovskiy, are not directly related either in the Caucasus or in Europe, they form separate clusters on the genetic distance-based dendrogram and the world parentage network of V. vinifera. The resulting pedigree of Muscat Hamburg and its descendants is in accordance with SSR-based (simple sequence repeats) studies and the described pedigree of this variety which confirms the use of the reduced SNP set for further studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据