4.5 Article

Fear Extinction-Based Inter-Individual and Sex Differences in Pain-Related Vocalizations and Anxiety-like Behaviors but Not Nocifensive Reflexes

期刊

BRAIN SCIENCES
卷 11, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11101339

关键词

vocalizations; fear extinction; pain; sex differences

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 NS038261, R01 NS106902, R01NS118731, R01 NS120395, R01 NS109255]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that female rats exhibited greater increases in vocalizations in pain models, especially in chronic neuropathic pain, and showed higher levels of anxiety-like behaviors under baseline conditions. However, no individual or sex differences were observed in mechanosensitivity in the pain models.
Inter-individual and sex differences in pain responses are recognized but their mechanisms are not well understood. This study was intended to provide the behavioral framework for analyses of pain mechanisms using fear extinction learning as a predictor of phenotypic and sex differences in sensory (mechanical withdrawal thresholds) and emotional-affective aspects (open field tests for anxiety-like behaviors and audible and ultrasonic components of vocalizations) of acute and chronic pain. In acute arthritis and chronic neuropathic pain models, greater increases in vocalizations were found in females than males and in females with poor fear extinction abilities than females with strong fear extinction, particularly in the neuropathic pain model. Female rats showed higher anxiety-like behavior than males under baseline conditions but no inter-individual or sex differences were seen in the pain models. No inter-individual and sex differences in mechanosensitivity were observed. The data suggest that vocalizations are uniquely suited to detect inter-individual and sex differences in pain models, particularly in chronic neuropathic pain, whereas no such differences were found for mechanosensitivity, and baseline differences in anxiety-like behaviors disappeared in the pain models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据