4.5 Article

Modulating Cognitive-Motor Multitasking with Commercial-off-the-Shelf Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation

期刊

BRAIN SCIENCES
卷 12, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12020180

关键词

cognitive-motor dual-tasking; tDCS; multitasking

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the effect of using a non-invasive brain stimulation device on balance performance under different cognitive demands. The results suggest that performing a secondary cognitive task influences postural sway, which can be mitigated by transcranial direct current stimulation. Additionally, lower surface stability increases postural sway.
One growing area of multitasking research involves a focus on performing cognitive and motor tasks in tandem. In these situations, increasing either cognitive or motor demands has implications for performance in both tasks, an effect which is thought to be due to competing neural resources. Separate research suggests that non-invasive brain stimulation may offer a means to mitigate performance decrements experienced during multitasking. In the present study, we investigated the degree to which a commercially available non-invasive brain stimulation device (Halo Sport) alters balance performance in the presence of different types of cognitive demands. Specifically, we tested if performing a secondary cognitive task impacts postural sway in healthy young adults and if we could mitigate this impact using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied over the primary motor cortex. Furthermore, we included conditions of unstable and stable surfaces and found that lower surface stability increased postural sway. In addition, we found that cognitive load impacted postural sway but in the opposite pattern we had anticipated, with higher sway found in the single-task control condition compared to executive function conditions. Finally, we found a small but significant effect of tDCS on balance with decreased sway for active (compared to sham) tDCS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据