4.6 Article

Zircon U-Pb Dating for Paragneiss in the Xinxian Area in the Dabie-Sulu Orogenic Belt and Its Geochemical Characteristics

期刊

FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/feart.2021.778377

关键词

zircon U-Pb age; dabie-sulu UHP metamorphic belt; paragneisses; xinxian; protolith of paragneiss

资金

  1. Key Laboratory of Isotope Dating and Geochemistry, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By analyzing the paragneiss from Xinxian area along the west edge of the Dabie-Sulu ultrahigh-pressure metamorphic belt, it is revealed that the protolith of the paragneiss may be formed by terrestrial materials, and it was formed later than the Triassic, with the main protolith age falling between 705-811 Ma.
In order to understand the subduction of the Yangtze block and its collision with the North China Craton, we performed the elements analysis and zircon U-Pb dating on paragneiss from Xinxian area, which located along the west edge of the Dabie-Sulu ultrahigh-pressure (UHP) metamorphic belt. The major elements analysis showed SiO2, Al2O3, and K2O were enriched and the rare-earth element (REE) analysis showed the paragneiss had a high content of REEs, especially light rare Earth elements (LREEs). The elements analysis suggest that the protolith of paragneiss may be formed by terrestrial materials. As reflected by cathode luminescence (CL), zircon in rocks was metomorphic and had a core-edge microstructure. The edge of zircon was dated by LA-ICP-MS at 233 +/- 24 Ma, which suggests that the paragneiss was formed later than the Triassic. The inherited zircon had a large age range of 456-1,727 Ma, mainly in the range of 705-811 Ma. The wide range of ages suggests that the protolith of paragneiss was sedimentary rocks formed no earlier than the Paleozoic. And the paragneiss from Xinxian area were generated in the Dabie-Sulu ocean basin or abortive ocean basin in the Paleozoic era.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据