4.6 Article

Uplift Performance of Plate Anchors in Cement-Stabilised Aeolian Sand

期刊

FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/feart.2021.783148

关键词

aeolian sand; cement-treated soil; stabilisation; backfills; pullout; ultimate bearing capacity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52069013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By adding cement to aeolian sand, significant increases in failure resistance and uplift stiffness of plate anchors can be achieved. However, distinct load-displacement responses were observed in tests on model plate anchors embedded in cement-stabilised aeolian sand and uncemented aeolian sand.
Comparative pullout tests were carried out on model plate anchors in uncemented aeolian sand (UAS) and cement-stabilised aeolian sand (CAS) with different embedment ratios of the embedment depth (H) to the width (D) of the plate to examine the effectiveness of the insertion of cement in aeolian sand to enhance the uplift performance of plate anchors. Experimental results demonstrated that significant increases in failure resistance and uplift stiffness can be achieved, irrespective of embedment ratios of H/D, when a relatively small amount of cement (an optimal cement content of 6% by weight of dry aeolian sand determined by direct shear test in this study) was added to the aeolian sand backfill. However, distinct load-displacement responses were observed in all the tests on the model plate anchors embedded in CAS and UAS backfills: two-phase of pre-peak and post-peak behaviour in CAS and three-phase of initial linear, nonlinear transition to peak uplift resistance, and post-peak behaviour in UAS; failure of the former started at tiny displacements and that of the latter appeared at large displacements. Therefore, the significant increases in uplift failure resistance and pre-peak uplift stiffness were limited to relatively low uplift displacements because of the brittle nature of the improved CAS backfills shear strength characteristics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据