4.6 Article

Pore Connectivity Characterization Using Coupled Wood's Metal Intrusion and High-Resolution Imaging: A Case of the Silurian Longmaxi Shales From the Sichuan Basin, China

期刊

FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/feart.2021.735647

关键词

shale gas; matrix pores; pore connectivity; wood's metal; Longmaxi Formation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41690133, 41821002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found significant differences in pore connectivity among different types of shales, with mixed mudstone showing excellent connectivity, siliceous shale presenting overall poor connectivity, and argillaceous shale primarily non-interconnected.
Pore connectivity is crucial for shale gas production. However, the three-dimensional (3D) characteristics and distribution of pore networks and, more fundamentally, the underlying role of different pore types on pore connectivity in shales are inadequately understood. By comparing the 3D pore connectivity derived from direct microstructural imaging of pores filled with Wood's metal at a pressure corresponding to the finest accessible pore throat in the resolution ranges that may be achieved by X-ray micro-CT and SEM, it is possible to evaluate pore connectivity of different types of shales. The pore connectivity of three shales including a mixed mudstone, siliceous shale, and argillaceous shale from the Silurian Longmaxi Formations is investigated via combined broad ion beam (BIB) polishing, and SEM and X-ray micro-CT imaging after Wood's metal injection at a pressure up to 380 MPa. The three shales show significant differences in pore connectivity. The mixed mudstone shows excellent pore connectivity in the matrix; the siliceous shale shows an overall poor connectivity with only a small amount of OM (organic matter) pores immediately adjacent to microfractures displaying interconnectivity, while the pores in the argillaceous shale, dominated by plate-like clay pores, are largely not interconnected.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据