4.6 Article

An In Vitro Evaluation of Denture Cleansing Regimens against a Polymicrobial Denture Biofilm Model

期刊

ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics11010113

关键词

biofilm model; polymicrobial; denture cleanser; antimicrobials

资金

  1. GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare
  2. BBSRC Industrial GlaxoSmithKline CASE PhD studentship [BB/V509541/1]
  3. BBSRC [BB/V509541/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the efficacy of different denture cleaning methods in reducing viable microorganisms in denture biofilms, and found that daily brushing with denture cleanser tablets was the most effective treatment.
Denture stomatitis (DS) is an inflammatory disease resulting from a polymicrobial biofilm perturbation at the denture surface-palatal mucosa interface. Recommendations made by dental health care professionals often lack clarity for appropriate denture cleaning. This study investigated the efficacy of brushing with off-the-shelf denture cleanser (DC) tablets (Poligrip(R)) vs. two toothpastes (Colgate(R) and Crest(R)) in alleviating the viable microorganisms (bacteria and fungi) in an in vitro denture biofilm model. Biofilms were grown on poly(methyl)methacrylate (PMMA) discs, then treated daily for 7 days with mechanical disruption (brushing), plus Poligrip(R) DC, Colgate(R) or Crest(R) toothpastes. Weekly treatment with Poligrip(R) DC on day 7 only was compared to daily modalities. All treatment parameters were processed to determine viable colony forming units for bacteria and fungi using the Miles and Misra technique, and imaged by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Brushing with daily DC therapy was the most effective treatment in reducing the viable biofilm over 7 days of treatment. Brushing only was ineffective in controlling the viable bioburden, which was confirmed by CLSM imaging. This data indicates that regular cleansing of PMMA with DC was best for polymicrobial biofilms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据