4.6 Article

Virulence, Antimicrobial Resistance and Biofilm Production of Escherichia coli Isolates from Healthy Broiler Chickens in Western Algeria

期刊

ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL
卷 10, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics10101157

关键词

virulence genes; antimicrobial resistance; extended-spectrum beta-lactamases; biofilm formation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study identified antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli strains with virulence and ESBL genes in healthy broiler chickens in Western Algeria, highlighting the potential spread of resistant bacteria in poultry populations.
The aim of this study was to assess the virulence, antimicrobial resistance and biofilm production of Escherichia coli strains isolated from healthy broiler chickens in Western Algeria. E. coli strains (n = 18) were identified by matrix-assisted laser desorption-ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Susceptibility to 10 antibiotics was determined by standard methods. Virulence and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) genes were detected by PCR. The biofilm production was evaluated by microplate assay. All the isolates were negative for the major virulence/toxin genes tested (rfbE, fliC, eaeA, stx1), except one was stx2-positive. However, all were resistant to at least three antibiotics. Ten strains were ESBL-positive. Seven carried the beta-lactamase bla(TEM) gene only and two co-harbored bla(TEM) and bla(CTX-M-1) genes. One carried the bla(SHV) gene. Among the seven strains harboring bla(TEM) only, six had putative enteroaggregative genes. Two contained irp2, two contained both irp2 and astA, one contained astA and another contained aggR, astA and irp2 genes. All isolates carrying ESBL genes were non-biofilm producers, except one weak producer. The ESBL-negative isolates were moderate biofilm producers and, among them, two harbored astA, two irp2, and one aggR, astA and irp2 genes. This study highlights the spread of antimicrobial-resistant E. coli strains from healthy broiler chickens in Western Algeria.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据