4.7 Article

Is Current Research on How Climate Change Impacts Global Food Security Really Objective?

期刊

FOODS
卷 10, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods10102342

关键词

climate change; food security; global; regions; facility

资金

  1. Western Light Talent Culture Project B [Y929091521]
  2. Shaanxi Province Talents Special Support Plan [Y939080101]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that there are two main issues with current research on the impact of climate change on global food security: incomplete research data and biased selection of research sites, with more studies conducted in developed countries than in developing countries. Therefore, more attention should be paid to developing countries, and new mathematical models should be utilized to integrate the data.
Global food insecurity is becoming more severe under the threat of rising global carbon dioxide concentrations, increasing population, and shrinking farmlands and their degeneration. We acquired the ISI Web of Science platform for over 31 years (1988-2018) to review the research on how climate change impacts global food security, and then performed cluster analysis and research hotspot analysis with VosViewer software. We found there were two drawbacks that exist in the current research. Firstly, current field research data were defective because they were collected from various facilities and were hard to integrate. The other drawback is the representativeness of field research site selection as most studies were carried out in developed countries and very few in developing countries. Therefore, more attention should be paid to developing countries, especially some African and Asian countries. At the same time, new modified mathematical models should be utilized to process and integrate the data from various facilities and regions. Finally, we suggested that governments and organizations across the world should be united to wrestle with the impact of climate change on food security.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据