4.7 Article

Anti-Inflammation and Protective Effects of Anethum graveolens L. (Dill Seeds) on Esophageal Mucosa Damages in Reflux Esophagitis-Induced Rats

期刊

FOODS
卷 10, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods10102500

关键词

Anethum graveolens L; anti-inflammation; NF-kappa B; reflux esophagitis

资金

  1. Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science & Technology Development Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea [PJ0142272020]
  2. Jeonbuk National University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dill seeds, commonly used as a seasoning, have shown therapeutic potential in treating indigestion and inflammation. Studies have demonstrated their anti-inflammatory effects in vitro and in rats with reflux esophagitis, indicating their potential for prevention and therapy of gastroesophageal diseases.
Anethum graveolens L. (dill seeds) are important medicinal and functional foods in Europe and central and south Asia, often used as a seasoning in daily diets. Anethum graveolens L. seeds (AGS) are used to treat indigestion and have shown physiological activities such as those against hypoglycemia and gastroesophageal disease. This study explored the protective effects of AGS extract on mucosal damages and inflammation in reflux esophagitis rats. AGS inhibited cellular inflammation including NO production and the expression of inflammatory proteins (iNOS and COX2 etc.), cytokines (IL-1 beta and TNF-alpha) and nuclear transfer factor related to NF-kappa B signaling caused by LPS stimulation in vitro. Furthermore, reflux esophagitis-induced rats were used to observe the anti-inflammatory effect of AGS. Tissue staining and inflammation-related protein expression of rats with acute reflux esophagitis indicated that AGS improved this inflammatory response, such as COX-2 and TNF-alpha in mucosa. In conclusion, AGS have good physiological activity and the possibility of being used as a medicinal food and a functional resource for the prevention and therapy of gastroesophageal diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据