4.7 Review

Metabolomics Approaches for the Comprehensive Evaluation of Fermented Foods: A Review

期刊

FOODS
卷 10, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods10102294

关键词

fermented foods; metabolomics; metabolomic approach; qualitative property

资金

  1. China Agriculture Research System [CARS-04]
  2. Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund [S2021JBKY-02]
  3. Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Incremental Fund [Y2020PT10]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fermented foods have complex chemical components that can modulate unique qualitative properties, highlighting the importance of monitoring small molecular metabolites for understanding their qualities. The expanding application of metabolomics in nutrition research of fermented foods enables the comprehensive analysis of flavor, nutrition, function, and safety aspects, emphasizing its significance in characterizing the qualitative properties of fermented foods.
Fermentation is an important process that can provide new flavors and nutritional and functional foods, to deal with changing consumer preferences. Fermented foods have complex chemical components that can modulate unique qualitative properties. Consequently, monitoring the small molecular metabolites in fermented food is critical to clarify its qualitative properties and help deliver personalized nutrition. In recent years, the application of metabolomics to nutrition research of fermented foods has expanded. In this review, we examine the application of metabolomics technologies in food, with a primary focus on the different analytical approaches suitable for food metabolomics and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of these approaches. In addition, we summarize emerging studies applying metabolomics in the comprehensive analysis of the flavor, nutrition, function, and safety of fermented foods, as well as emphasize the applicability of metabolomics in characterizing the qualitative properties of fermented foods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据