4.7 Article

Latest Advances in Protein-Recovery Technologies from Agricultural Waste

期刊

FOODS
卷 10, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods10112748

关键词

agricultural waste; protein; amylase; liquid biphasic system; separation

资金

  1. Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia under UPM Putra Grant [GP-IPB/2018/9660302]
  2. Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In recent years, downstream bioprocessing industries have been adopting advanced purification and extraction methods to achieve more efficient and simple separation processes. The liquid biphasic system (LBS) is considered an efficient, cost-effective, and adaptable method for protein recovery, highlighting its advantages over traditional methods.
In recent years, downstream bioprocessing industries are venturing into less tedious, simple, and high-efficiency separation by implementing advanced purification and extraction methods. This review discusses the separation of proteins, with the main focus on amylase as an enzyme from agricultural waste using conventional and advanced techniques of extraction and purification via a liquid biphasic system (LBS). In comparison to other methods, such as membrane extraction, precipitation, ultrasonication, and chromatography, the LBS stands out as an efficient, cost-effective, and adaptable developing method for protein recovery. The two-phase separation method can be water-soluble polymers, or polymer and salt, or alcohol and salt, which is a simpler and lower-cost method that can be used at a larger purification scale. The comparison of different approaches in LBS for amylase purification from agricultural waste is also included. Current technology has evolved from a simple LBS into microwave-assisted LBS, liquid biphasic flotation (LBF), thermoseparation (TMP), three-phase partitioning (TPP), ultrasound-assisted LBS, and electrically assisted LBS. pH, time, temperature, and concentration are some of the significant research parameters considered in the review of advanced techniques.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据