4.7 Article

Phytic Acid against Clostridium perfringens Type A: A Food Matrix Study

期刊

FOODS
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods11030406

关键词

antimicrobial activity; inositol hexaphosphate; myo-inositol-1; 2; 3; 4; 5; 6-hexakisphosphate

资金

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior-Brazil (CAPES) [001]
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico-Brazil (CNPq)
  3. Fundacao Araucaria-Brazil-Programa Universal Pesquisa Basica e Aplicada [346/2014]
  4. Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT, Portugal) by national funds FCT/MCTES [UIDB/00690/2020]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the inhibitory effect of phytic acid (PA) on the growth of Clostridium perfringens and its potential use as a natural preservative in the meat industry. The results showed that PA effectively inhibited the germination of spores and the growth of vegetative cells. A mixture of PA-MD exhibited a similar or higher inhibitory effect compared to traditional preservatives in cooked sausages.
This study evaluated the inhibitory effect of phytic acid (PA) on the spore germination and vegetative cells growth of Clostridium perfringens type A, as well as its effect in combination with maltodextrin (MD) in cooked sausages. The addition of 1% PA showed a satisfactory inhibition of spores' germination and vegetative cells growth of C. perfringens in BHI media. The inhibitory effect of 1% PA on vegetative cells was similar to the additive sodium sorbate (SS) at 10%. Subsequently, a mixture of PA-MD (1:1; w/w) was evaluated for the inhibition of C. perfringens spores in cooked sausages. The PA-MD 1.5% and 2.5% had a similar performance to SS 10% and a similar or higher performance than 0.015% NO2 (p < 0.05). In an unprecedented way, the present study demonstrated that PA inhibited spore germination and vegetative cells growth of C. perfringens, highlighting its potential use as an alternative and natural preservative for the meat industry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据