4.7 Article

Color, Starch Digestibility, and In Vitro Fermentation of Roasted Highland Barley Flour with Different Fractions

期刊

FOODS
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods11030287

关键词

highland barley flour; particle sizes; in vitro starch digestibility; in vitro fermentation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31701610]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [XDJK2019B027]
  3. Postgraduate Mentor Team-Building Program of Southwest University [XYDS201905]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Particle sizes have an impact on the physicochemical and nutritional properties of highland barley flour, and sand roasting process can increase starch digestibility while decreasing the production of total short-chain fatty acids.
Highland barley (HB) is commonly milled into flour for direct consumption or further processed with other food formulations. Nevertheless, the association between milling and HB flour properties remains lacking. This work studied the effect of particle sizes (coarse, 250-500 mu m; medium, 150-250 mu m; fine, <150 mu m) on physicochemical and nutritional properties of raw and sand-roasted HB flour. Gelatinization enthalpy decreased with increasing particle sizes of raw HB flour, while no endothermic transitions were observed in sand-roasted flour. Sand roasting destroyed starch granules and decreased short-range molecular order. Starch digestibility increased while total short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) production decreased with decreasing particle sizes in all samples. The relative crystallinity of sand-roasted HB flour decreased by 80-88% compared with raw samples. Sand roasting raised in vitro starch digestibility, while total SCFAs during in vitro fecal fermentation decreased. Sand-roasted HB flour with particle sizes <150 mu m had the highest starch digestibility (94.0%) but the lowest production of total SCFAs (1.89-2.24 mM). Pearson's correlation analysis confirmed the relationship between the nutritional qualities of HB flour and milling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据