4.7 Article

A Comparison of β-Carotene, Phytoene and Amino Acids Production in Dunaliella salina DF 15 (CCAP 19/41) and Dunaliella salina CCAP 19/30 Using Different Light Wavelengths

期刊

FOODS
卷 10, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods10112824

关键词

microalgae; carotenoids; LED; novel food; halophile

资金

  1. UKRI Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) Food Network+ (SFN)
  2. Interreg 2 Seas programme - European Regional Development Fund [2S05017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Strains of Dunaliella salina microalgae are of interest due to their ability to accumulate beta-carotene and produce high-quality protein. However, the protein quality in terms of essential amino acids could be improved, and the strain demonstrates a higher umami compound concentration under red light.
Strains of Dunaliella salina microalgae are of considerable research and industrial interest because they hyper-accumulate beta-carotene as well as produce high-quality protein. To explore the co-production of valuable compounds in D. salina, this study compared the production of beta-carotene, phytoene and amino acids in two strains cultivated under white, red or blue light until no further nitrogen was available. D. salina DF15 (CCAP 19/41 (PLY DF15)) produced more than 12% beta-carotene (ash-free dry weight (AFDW) basis), and red light triggered the production of 9-cis beta-carotene at a 9-cis/all-trans beta-carotene ratio of 1.5. Phytoene production was also evident in D. salina DF15 under all conditions, particularly under blue light. However, the profile of essential amino acids (EAAs) and calculation of the essential amino acid index (EAAI) was less than ideal in terms of protein quality, for both strains. Umami compounds, quantified as monosodium glutamate (MSG) equivalents, indicated a higher equivalent umami concentration (EUC) in D. salina DF15 under red light (3.2 g MSG/100 g AFDW) than in D. salina CCAP19/30. Overall, D. salina DF15 demonstrates valuable traits for further exploration and product optimisation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据