4.7 Article

A FT-NIR Process Analytical Technology Approach for Milk Renneting Control

期刊

FOODS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods11010033

关键词

FT-NIR spectroscopy; Industry 4.0; milk coagulation; multivariate statistical process control charts; MSPC; PAT; skimmed milk powder

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a process analytical technology approach using near infrared spectroscopy and multivariate statistical process control charts for the control of milk coagulation. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of this method in monitoring coagulation times and detecting possible failures.
The study proposes a process analytical technology (PAT) approach for the control of milk coagulation through near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), computing multivariate statistical process control (MSPC) charts, based on principal component analysis (PCA). Reconstituted skimmed milk and commercial pasteurized skimmed milk were mixed at two different ratios (60:40 and 40:60). Each mix ratio was prepared in six replicates and used for coagulation trials, monitored by fundamental rheology, as a reference method, and NIRS by inserting a probe directly in the coagulation vat and collecting spectra at two different acquisition times, i.e., 60 s or 10 s. Furthermore, three failure coagulation trials were performed, deliberately changing temperature or rennet and CaCl2 concentration. The comparison with fundamental rheology results confirmed the effectiveness of NIRS to monitor milk renneting. The reduced spectral acquisition time (10 s) showed data highly correlated (r > 0.99) to those acquired with longer acquisition time. The developed decision trees, based on PC1 scores and T-2 MSPC charts, confirmed the suitability of the proposed approach for the prediction of coagulation times and for the detection of possible failures. In conclusion, the work provides a robust but simple PAT approach to assist cheesemakers in monitoring the coagulation step in real-time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据