4.7 Article

Meat Substitution with Oat Protein Can Improve Ground Beef Patty Characteristics

期刊

FOODS
卷 10, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods10123071

关键词

cooked color; fresh color; ground beef patty; oat protein

资金

  1. Tarleton State University
  2. College of Agriculture and Natural Resources

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Consumer acceptance of alternative plant-focused ingredients is increasing in the meat industry, with oat protein being used to increase yield and fat retention. Despite its positive effects on cook yield, inclusion of oat protein in ground beef patties may have a negative impact on color and tenderness.
The consumer acceptance of alternative plant-focused ingredients within the meat industry is growing globally. Oat protein is insoluble and used to increase product yield and fat retention. Furthermore, inclusion of oat protein can provide manufacturers another option for extending beef supplies. As the consumer diet shifts for improvements in nutritional density, oat protein is an alternative ingredient that lacks information on inclusion in a ground beef formulation. Coarse ground beef was allocated to one of four treatments, mixed with oat protein (0%, 1.5%, 3.5% and 4.5%), water, salt, pepper, textured vegetable protein, soy protein concentrate, and sodium tripolyphosphate. Meat blocks (n = 3 batches) were finely ground and formed into patties (N = 65/treatment). Patties were placed onto an expanded polystyrene tray, overwrapped with polyvinyl chloride film and displayed for 7 days. Instrumental color (L*, a*, and b*) decreased throughout simulated display (p = 0.0001). Increased usage rates of oat protein in patties resulted in greater cook yields (p = 0.0001). Objective measures of Allo-Kramer shear force values increased as oat protein inclusion rates increased (p = 0.0001). Oat protein can be incorporated in ground beef patties with positive effects on cook yield, but inclusion rate may have a deleterious impact on color and instrumental tenderness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据