4.7 Article

Integration Bioprocess of B-Phycoerythrin and Exopolysaccharides Production From Photosynthetic Microalga Porphyridium cruentum

期刊

FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2021.836370

关键词

Porphyridium; biomass production; phycoerythrin; exopolysaccharide; outdoor scale-up culture

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFA0902503]
  2. Shangdong Taishan Scholars Program [tsqn202103144]
  3. Innovation Foundation of QIBEBT [QIBEBT I201920]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to establish the integration bioprocess of B-PE and EPS production from red microalga Porphyridium cruentum. The effects of different growth medium and CO2 concentration on biomass and B-PE and EPS contents were evaluated. Optimal conditions for extracting B-PE and EPS were determined, and high-purity B-PE with significant physicochemical properties of EPS were obtained.
Red microalga Porphyridium cruentum has great potential for converting CO2 into high-value bioactive compounds, such as B-phycoerythrin (B-PE) and extracellular polysaccharides or exopolysaccharides (EPS). This study aimed to establish the integration bioprocess of B-PE and EPS production from P. cruentum. First, different kinds of growth medium and CO2 concentration were assessed indoor in terms of high biomass and B-PE and EPS contents. As follows, P. cruentum cells were outdoor scale-up cultured in 700 L pressurized tubular reactors for 9 days till the biomass reached 0.85 g/L and then separated from supernatants via centrifugation. Three different methods were adopted to extract phycobiliproteins, and the highest PE contents were extracted from cells by repeated freeze-thawing treatment along with the optimization of significant variables, and finally, 7.99 mg/L B-PE (16,500 Da) with a purity index of 0.82 was obtained. Moreover, analysis of physicochemical properties of EPS extracted from P. cruentum showed that the sulfate content was 14.85% and the uronic acid content was 9.36%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据