4.6 Article

Computer-aided molecular design of imidazole-based absorbents for CO2 capture

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.02.023

关键词

QSPR; De novo; Applicability domain; CO2 capture; Imidazole

资金

  1. CLIMIT [233776]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reactive absorption of CO2 by aqueous amine solutions is widely used in the oil, gas and petrochemical industries. However, the energy cost associated with CO2 capture is still a major hurdle to global implementation. Finding new absorbent systems with improved properties is therefore critical to the safety and efficiency of the carbon capture process. Owing to a wide range of tunable properties, imidazoles or imidazoles/amine mixtures have recently been identified as promising to address some of these challenges. In this work, evolutionary de novo design is used to propose new imidazole-based compounds suitable for carbon capture. At the core of this scheme is a genetic algorithm that optimizes the acid dissociation constant (pK(a)), an important factor governing the performance of solvents. Calculation of the pK(a) using quantum chemical methods may produce accurate results but is often too computationally demanding to be suitable for a de novo design setup, where thousands of structures are evaluated over many iterations. To improve the efficacy of the evolutionary process while maintaining high accuracy, we apply a quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR) model that relates molecular structure descriptors calculated at the semi-empirical level to experimentally determined pK(a) values. Several promising compounds with high pK(a) (>10) were identified by the evolutionary design approach and further validated using density functional theory calculations. QSPR models for equally relevant physical properties (such as density, viscosity, vapour pressure) and biodegradability were used as additional filters to ensure that the high pK(a) structures also have favourable values for these properties. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据