4.6 Article

Lessons learned from using expert elicitation to identify, assess and rank the potential leakage scenarios at the Heletz pilot CO2 injection site

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.02.018

关键词

Heletz CO2 storage; Caprock integrity; Expert elicitation; Lessons learned during elicitation; Caprock leakage scenarios

资金

  1. European Community [227286]
  2. Scottish Funding Council for the Joint Research Institute
  3. Heriot-Watt University which is part of the Edinburgh Research Partnership in Engineering and Mathematics (ERPem)
  4. EPSRC [EP/K000446/2] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K000446/2, 1090213] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Natural Environment Research Council [1512943] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Expert elicitation is a useful approach to synthesis expert knowledge, experience and insight when the input data and analysis is limited. During the early stages of the EU FP7 MUSTANG pilot CO2 injection experiment at Heletz, Israel there was very little input data available, yet decisions had to be made regarding data collection, drilling, operation and monitoring strategies. An expert elicitation study was undertaken to identify, assess and rank potential CO2 leakage scenarios at Heletz to provide guidance to support the decision making processes. This paper presents a critique of the expert elicitation process undertaken, presenting the methodology and a discussion of the results. We present the lessons learned during the expert elicitation process, highlighting its advantages and limitations and provide suggestions on ways to overcome these limitations. Our findings show that prudent expert elicitation can make a valuable contribution to decision making, however if done improperly it can equally lead to invalid or misleading results and wrong decisions. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据