4.6 Review

The Association of Body Mass Index With the Risk of Pulmonary Hypertension in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

期刊

FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.680223

关键词

obesity; body mass index; pulmonary hypertension; systematic review; meta-analysis

资金

  1. West China School of Nursing for their support

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Findings regarding the association between body mass index (BMI) and pulmonary hypertension are conflicting. This systematic review and meta-analysis found no significant association between BMI and pulmonary hypertension, but identified a significant positive association in studies controlled for cofounders and with larger sample sizes.
Backgrounds: Findings regarding the association of body mass index (BMI) with pulmonary hypertension (PH) are conflicting, and there is no systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the results. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess this relationship. Methods: To detect the relevant articles, PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar were searched until February 2021. Included essays were pooled using a random-effect model. Cochrane Q-test and I-2-test was applied to assess between-study heterogeneity. Results: Fourteen articles (eight cross-sectional and four cohort studies) were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis of comparing highest vs. lowest BMI categories did not indicate a significant association between BMI and PH (Summary Effect Estimate: 1.59 (95% CI: 0.50, 5.07, I-2 = 92.3). Furthermore, The summary risk estimate for a one-unit increment in BMI was 1.01 (95 % CI: 0.99, 1.03), with high heterogeneity, I-2 = 73.5 %, P heterogeneity < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed significant positive association between BMI and the risk of PH in studies controlled for cofounders, and studies with higher sample sizes (>= 2,000). Conclusion: There is no significant association between BMI and risk of pulmonary hypertension. Further studies are required to confirm these findings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据