4.6 Article

Relationship Between Peripheral Refraction in Different Retinal Regions and Myopia Development of Young Chinese People

期刊

FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.802706

关键词

peripheral refraction; myopia; multispectral refractive topography; ocular biometrics; retinal eccentricity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study observed the association between regional peripheral refraction and myopia development in young Chinese individuals. Findings show that peripheral refraction error increased with eccentricity, and it varied significantly with myopia severity between 20 and 35 degrees of eccentricity. Additionally, axial length was positively correlated with peripheral refraction error.
ObjectiveTo observe the associations between regional peripheral refraction and myopia development in young Chinese people. MethodsTwo hundred and forty-one young adult subjects (21 emmetropes, 88 low myopes, 94 moderate myopes, and 38 high myopes) aged 18-28 years were included, and only the right eyes were tested. Eye biometrics were measured before pupil dilation using the Lenstar. Relative peripheral refractive errors (RPRE) were measured after pupil dilation using multispectral refractive topography (MRT), at nine retinal eccentricities: 0-5, 5-10, 10-15, 15-20, 20-25, 25-30, 30-35, 35-40, and 40-45 degrees. ResultsIn this study, RPRE increased with eccentricity, and it shows a growing trend with the increase of the degree of myopia among emmetropia, low myopia and moderate myopia groups, and RPRE varied with myopia severity at eccentricities between 20 and 35 degrees only. In addition, axial length (AL) and RPRE were positively correlated between 20 and 45 degrees, and AL was an independent risk factor for RPRE between 20 and 35 degrees. ConclusionThese findings indicate that the eccentricities between 20 and 35 degrees RPRE may be closely related to refractive development and eye growth in young Chinese people.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据