4.6 Article

The Prenatal Diagnosis and Clinical Outcomes of Fetuses With 15q11.2 Copy Number Variants: A Case Series of 36 Patients

期刊

FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.754521

关键词

15q11; 2 microdeletion; 2 microduplication; BP1-BP2; copy number variant; chromosome microarray analysis (CMA); prenatal; neurodevelopment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study analyzed data from 36 pregnant women who underwent prenatal microarray analysis at National Taiwan University Hospital, focusing on 15q11.2 copy number variants (CNVs) involving the BP1-BP2 region. The prognosis of 15q11.2 CNVs remains controversial, with some fetuses having microduplications and others with microdeletions. While some pregnant women chose termination of pregnancy, no obvious developmental delays or neurological disorders were detected in early childhood.
Prenatal genetic counseling of fetuses diagnosed with 15q11.2 copy number variants (CNVs) involving the BP1-BP2 region is difficult due to limited information and controversial opinion on prognosis. In total, we collected the data of 36 pregnant women who underwent prenatal microarray analysis from 2010 to 2017 and were assessed at National Taiwan University Hospital. Comparison of the maternal characteristics, prenatal ultrasound findings, and postnatal outcomes among the different cases involving the 15q11.2 BP1-BP2 region were presented. Out of the 36 fetuses diagnosed with CNVs involving the BP1-BP2 region, five were diagnosed with microduplications and 31 with microdeletions. Among the participants, 10 pregnant women received termination of pregnancy and 26 gave birth to healthy individuals (27 babies in total). The prognoses of 15q11.2 CNVs were controversial and recent studies have revealed its low pathogenicity. In our study, the prenatal abnormal ultrasound findings were recorded in 12 participants and were associated with 15q11.2 deletions. No obvious developmental delay or neurological disorders were detected in early childhood.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据