4.6 Article

Multi-Omics-Based Discovery of Plant Signaling Molecules

期刊

METABOLITES
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/metabo12010076

关键词

plant signaling molecules; multi-omics; secondary metabolites; structures and functions

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [31801268]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  3. Israel Science Foundation Joint Grant [32061143023]
  4. Shenzhen Municipal Startup Fund
  5. BGI Research Open Fund [BGIRSZ20210014]
  6. Key Laboratory of Molecular Design for the Plant Cell Factory of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes [2019KSYS006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review discusses the application of multi-omics in the discovery of plant signaling metabolites, highlighting how it addresses the challenges of known metabolites with unknown functions, unknown metabolites with known functions, and unknown metabolites and functions. The current limitations and future development of multi-omics in discovering plant signaling metabolites are also discussed.
Plants produce numerous structurally and functionally diverse signaling metabolites, yet only relatively small fractions of which have been discovered. Multi-omics has greatly expedited the discovery as evidenced by increasing recent works reporting new plant signaling molecules and relevant functions via integrated multi-omics techniques. The effective application of multi-omics tools is the key to uncovering unknown plant signaling molecules. This review covers the features of multi-omics in the context of plant signaling metabolite discovery, highlighting how multi-omics addresses relevant aspects of the challenges as follows: (a) unknown functions of known metabolites; (b) unknown metabolites with known functions; (c) unknown metabolites and unknown functions. Based on the problem-oriented overview of the theoretical and application aspects of multi-omics, current limitations and future development of multi-omics in discovering plant signaling metabolites are also discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据