4.6 Article

Foodomic-Based Approach for the Control and Quality Improvement of Dairy Products

期刊

METABOLITES
卷 11, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/metabo11120818

关键词

transcriptomics; proteomics; metabolomics; food safety; food fraud; transformation processes

资金

  1. GAIN (Axencia Galega de Innovacion, Xunta de Galicia, Spain) [IN607A2019/01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Food quality assurance is a necessary requirement to protect consumer interests and promote continuous improvement of sensory and nutritional properties. Recent food research has focused on the use of 'foodomics' technology, such as transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics, for controlling and improving the quality of dairy products.
The food quality assurance before selling is a needed requirement intended for protecting consumer interests. In the same way, it is also indispensable to promote continuous improvement of sensory and nutritional properties. In this regard, food research has recently contributed with studies focused on the use of 'foodomics'. This review focuses on the use of this technology, represented by transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics, for the control and quality improvement of dairy products. The complex matrix of these foods requires sophisticated technology able to extract large amounts of information with which to influence their aptitude for consumption. Thus, throughout the article, different applications of the aforementioned technologies are described and discussed in essential matters related to food quality, such as the detection of fraud and/or adulterations, microbiological safety, and the assessment and improvement of transformation industrial processes (e.g., fermentation and ripening). The magnitude of the reported results may open the door to an in-depth transformation of the most conventional analytical processes, with the introduction of new techniques that allow a greater understanding of the biochemical phenomena occurred in this type of food.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据