4.5 Article

Highly Specific Sigma Receptor Ligands Exhibit Anti-Viral Properties in SARS-CoV-2 Infected Cells

期刊

PATHOGENS
卷 10, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pathogens10111514

关键词

drug discovery; sigma-1 receptor; SARS-CoV-2; molecular docking; antiviral therapeutics

资金

  1. Emerging Pathogens Institute start-up funds
  2. University of Florida Clinical and Translational Science Institute
  3. NIH National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences [UL1TR001427]
  4. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Institute of Infection and Immunity [VR3-172626]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study identified sigma receptor ligands with agonism of the sigma-1 receptor, ligation of the sigma-2 receptor, and a combination of the two pathways as effective in inhibiting SARS-CoV-2 infection, offering a potential therapeutic avenue for COVID-19 prevention and treatment in primate and human cells.
(1) Background: There is a strong need for prevention and treatment strategies for COVID-19 that are not impacted by SARS-CoV-2 mutations emerging in variants of concern. After virus infection, host ER resident sigma receptors form direct interactions with non-structural SARS-CoV-2 proteins present in the replication complex. (2) Methods: In this work, highly specific sigma receptor ligands were investigated for their ability to inhibit both SARS-CoV-2 genome replication and virus induced cellular toxicity. This study found antiviral activity associated with agonism of the sigma-1 receptor (e.g., SA4503), ligation of the sigma-2 receptor (e.g., CM398), and a combination of the two pathways (e.g., AZ66). (3) Results: Intermolecular contacts between these ligands and sigma receptors were identified by structural modeling. (4) Conclusions: Sigma receptor ligands and drugs with off-target sigma receptor binding characteristics were effective at inhibiting SARS-CoV-2 infection in primate and human cells, representing a potential therapeutic avenue for COVID-19 prevention and treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据