4.5 Article

Transcriptome-Based Identification of a Functional Fasciola hepatica Carboxylesterase B

期刊

PATHOGENS
卷 10, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pathogens10111454

关键词

Fasciolosis; bioinformatics; transcriptome; carboxylesterase; zymogram

资金

  1. National Council for Science and Technology of Mexico (CONACYT) [CIPN 2015-021, 255478]
  2. INIFAP [13174433989, 1172635360]
  3. DGAPA/UNAM [PAPIIT-IN204214, PAPIIT-IN206517]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bioinformatics analysis identified a putative carboxylesterase B enzyme in Fasciola hepatica, with its gene found in the complete genomes of two reported strains. Experimental assays confirmed the enzyme's molecular weight and activity. Further analysis suggested conservation of the enzyme's DNA sequences in other parasitic trematodes.
Bioinformatics analysis of the complete transcriptome of Fasciola hepatica, identified a total of ten putative carboxylesterase transcripts, including a 3146 bp mRNA transcript coding a 2205 bp open reading frame that translates into a protein of 735 amino acids, resulting in a predicted protein mass of 83.5 kDa and a putative carboxylesterase B enzyme. The gene coding for this enzyme was found in two reported F. hepatica complete genomes stretching 23,230 bp, containing two exons of 1282 and 1864 bp, respectively, as well as a 20,084 bp intron between the exons. The enzymatic activity was experimentally assayed on F. hepatica protein extracts by SDS-PAGE zymograms using synthetic chromogenic substrates, confirming both the theoretical molecular weight and carboxylesterase enzymatic activity. Further bioinformatics predicted that this enzyme is an integral component of the cellular membrane that should be active as a 167 kDa homodimer complex and polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) zymograms experiments confirmed the analysis. Additional bioinformatics analysis showed that DNA sequences that code for this particular enzyme are highly conserved in other parasitic trematodes, although they are labeled hypothetical proteins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据