4.5 Article

Molecular Characterization of Associated Pathogens in Febrile Patients during Inter-Epidemic Periods of Urban Arboviral Diseases in Tapachula Southern Mexico

期刊

PATHOGENS
卷 10, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pathogens10111450

关键词

Arbovirus; Chikungunya; ZIKA; Leptospira; Flavivirus; Alphavirus; Mexico

资金

  1. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACyT)
  2. Fondo Institucional para el Desarrollo Cientifico,, Tecnologico y de Innovacion FORDECYT-PRONACES [CF-MG-20191021151912477-514867]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In serum samples from 253 suspected arbovirus infection patients in the southern border region of Mexico, a high percentage tested positive for CHIKV, with the first identification of Leptospira Kmetyi in Mexico. Etiological agents for fever were determined in 94% of the analyzed samples.
Emerging and re-emerging vector-borne infections are a global public health threat. In endemic regions, fever is the main reason for medical attention, and the etiological agent of such fever is not usually identified. In this study, non-specific febrile pathogens were molecularly characterized in serum samples from 253 patients suspected of arbovirus infection. The samples were collected in the southern border region of Mexico from April to June 2015, and February to March 2016. ZIKV, CHIKV, DENV, leptospirosis, and rickettsiosis were detected by qPCR and nested PCR to identify flavivirus and alphavirus genera. The results indicated that 71.93% of the samples were positive for CHIKV, 0.79% for ZIKV, and 0.39% for DENV, with the number positive for CHIKV increasing to 76.67% and those positive for ZIKV increasing to 15.41% under the nested PCR technique. Leptospira Kmetyi was identified for the first time in Mexico, with a prevalence of 3.16%. This is the first report of ZIKV in Mexico, as well the first detection of the virus in early 2015. In conclusion, the etiological agent of fever was determined in 94% of the analyzed samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据