4.5 Article

In Vitro 3D Staphylococcus aureus Abscess Communities Induce Bone Marrow Cells to Expand into Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells

期刊

PATHOGENS
卷 10, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pathogens10111446

关键词

Staphylococcus aureus; staphylococcal abscess community; myeloid-derived suppressor cell; 3D in vitro model; bone infection; host-pathogen interaction

资金

  1. AOTrauma [AR2017_05]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that SACs can trigger MDSC expansion and identified potential mediators as an additional strategy for treating chronic S. aureus infections.
Staphylococcus aureus is the main causative pathogen of subcutaneous, bone, and implant-related infections, forming structures known as staphylococcal abscess communities (SACs) within tissues that also contain immunosuppressive myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs). Although both SACs and MDSCs are present in chronic S. aureus infections, it remains unknown whether SACs directly trigger MDSC expansion. To investigate this, a previously developed 3D in vitro SAC model was co-cultured with murine and human bone marrow cells. Subsequently, it was shown that SAC-exposed human CD11b(low/-) myeloid cells or SAC-exposed murine CD11b(+) Gr-1(+) cells were immunosuppressive mainly by reducing absolute CD4(+) and CD8 alpha(+) T cell numbers, as shown in T cell proliferation assays and with flow cytometry. Monocytic MDSCs from mice with an S. aureus bone infection also strongly reduced CD4(+) and CD8 alpha(+) T cell numbers. Using protein biomarker analysis and an immunoassay, we detected in SAC-bone marrow co-cultures high levels of GM-CSF, IL-6, VEGF, IL-1 beta, TNF alpha, IL-10, and TGF-beta. Furthermore, SAC-exposed neutrophils expressed Arg-1 and SAC-exposed monocytes expressed Arg-1 and iNOS, as shown via immunofluorescent stains. Overall, this study showed that SACs cause MDSC expansion from bone marrow cells and identified possible mediators to target as an additional strategy for treating chronic S. aureus infections.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据