4.7 Article

Assessment of integrated CO2 geologic storage and geothermal harvest in a semi-closed thin reservoir

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2021.101773

关键词

Semi-dosed reservoir; Geothermal production; CO2 sequestration; Fault leakage; Response surface

资金

  1. BP Oman [BP-DVC-WRC-18-01]
  2. Sultan Qaboos University, Oman [DR/RG/17]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CO2 plume geothermal production combined with Carbon Dioxide geological storage offers a new technique to utilize non-carbon renewable energy and offset storage costs. This study addresses the lack of research on fault-compartmentalized, inclined reservoirs, providing guidance for optimal well placement and operation in geothermal fields.
CO2 plume geothermal (CPG) production built on the ongoing or completed Carbon Dioxide (CO2) geological storage (CGS) offers an emerging technique to harvest non-carbon renewable energy and offset CGS cost. Several studies on integrated CGS and CPG considered traditional 5-spot well placement in large-scale and thick saline formations with open boundaries. Very limited studies have been conducted on fault-compartmentalized, inclined thin reservoirs, which are widely available in oil/gas fields. Critical pressure management and risk of fault leakage have to be carefully evaluated dealing with such kind of geological structures. The aim of this study is to fill in this knowledge gap in the field of integrated CGS and CPG. A suite of model simulations is designed and experimented to assess CO2 sequestration and circulation in a fault-reservoir system under three levels of critical overpressure. Sensitivity of performance indictors to well space and circulation rate are quantitatively and continuously evaluated in their ranges using response surface method. Analysis of response surfaces yields a simple but efficient guidance for geothermal field planner and operator to find optimal well placement and operation scheme according to the priority of goals, including maximal energy production, desired heat energy capacity, expected lifespan.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据