4.7 Article

Collaborative optimization for a multi-energy system considering carbon capture system and power to gas technology

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2021.101765

关键词

Collaborative optimization; Planning and operation; Multi-energy system; Power to gas; Carbon capture system

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [72074075]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Beijing [9212017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper explores the relationship between carbon capture systems and power to gas technology in the power system in China and proposes a collaborative optimization plan to achieve deeper decarbonization and carbon tax relief. The results show positive effects on carbon mitigation and renewable energy utilization.
Decarbonization of the power system is a crucial way to mitigate global warming. Carbon capture and renewable energy utilization are constructive solutions to realize decarbonization from the perspective of emission and generation, respectively. Considering the co-existence of a high proportion of coal-fired power plants and large-scale renewable energy in China, this paper couples the carbon capture system (CCS) and power to gas (P2G) technology to establish the relationship between the carbon reduction and the renewable energy utilization strategies, and proposes a collaborative optimization of planning and operation for a multi-energy system considering the two technologies. Compared with the baseline case, simulation results show that the proposed model achieves positive effects on carbon mitigation and renewable energy penetration with less cost. This study highlights the significant potential of the coordination of carbon capture systems and the power to gas technology towards deeper decarbonization and carbon tax relief. In addition, we propose some insights on the social acceptance of CCS and P2G from the qualitative perspective to achieve the goal of raising awareness on the successful development of the two technologies in China.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据