4.7 Article

Preparation of Ni-based steel slag catalyst by impregnation method for sludge steam gasification

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2021.101553

关键词

Sewage sludge; Gasification; Steel slag; Catalyst; Hydrogen

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Chang'an University [300102290104]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province [2021JM-152, 2021JM-153]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrates that loading Ni-based catalyst onto steel slag using impregnation method can improve the efficiency of hydrogen production during sludge steam gasification. However, excessive steam flowrate and loading rate of Ni-based catalyst can lead to a decrease in gas production. The impregnation method effectively disperses active sites and enhances catalytic activity.
In this study, a nickel (Ni)-based catalyst was loaded onto steel slag that was rich in metal oxides using impregnation method. The effects of the catalyst on hydrogen-rich gas produced using sludge steam gasification were discussed. Under the conditions of 900 celcius, steam flowrate of 1.5 g min(-1) and 20% Ni-based loading rate, the gas and H-2 yield reached 0.78 Nm(3) kg(-1) and 15.72 mol kg-1. At this time, the volume fraction of H-2 was as high as 45.096%. Compared with the raw sludge gasification without Ni-based catalyst, the gas and H-2 yield were increased by 39.22% and 60.15% respectively. However, excessive flowrate of steam (>1.5 g min(-1)) and excessive rate of loading of Ni-based (>25%) catalyst would lead to a decrease in the production of gas. In addition, the impregnation method could effectively disperse NiO particles on the surface of the support, increasing the ratio of active sites on the surface of catalyst and improving the catalytic activity. These characteristics indicated that the Ni-based steel slag catalysts prepared by the impregnation method had high application potential in the process of sludge steam gasification, and provided a novel idea for solid wastes recycling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据